Three Dioceses Now Poised To Leave The Episcopal Church; The PB’s Threats

With Fort Worth’s votes this weekend, three Dioceses have passed on the first reading of changes to their Constitutions which would effectively remove them from the Episcopal Church – San Joaquin, Pittsburgh, and Ft. Worth. All three Diocesan Bishops have been threatened by the Presiding Bishop with presentment. I find these threats insulting to the laity and clergy of the Episcopal Church.

What the Presiding Bishop fails to realize is that, in our unique polity, Diocesan bishops merely preside over their conventions. The cannot dictate on what resolutions the convention will vote. Additionally, in the Dioceses in which I am familiar, there is no power for the bishop to veto legislative actions of the Diocesan Convention. Therefore, it is neither plausible nor fair to hold bishops liable for what their conventions do.

Moreover, I am disgusted by the presumptuous approach of the Presiding Bishop. Then again, liberalism in the Episcopal Church is largely clericalism. For liberal Episcopalians, it is all about who gets to wear what collar or hat. In 2003, rather than getting the theology straight on same sex blessings, they first voted to have an openly gay bishop. This, of course, was watershed.

If and when a Diocese votes to leave the Episcopal Church, the only legal issue out there is whether their is a trust on the Diocesan property in favor of the Episcopal Church. All the rest is extortion and clericalism.

South Park’s Cartman comes to mind – “You must respect my authoritie.”


3 Responses to “Three Dioceses Now Poised To Leave The Episcopal Church; The PB’s Threats”

  1. 1 paul November 19, 2007 at 1:52 am

    actually I think Bishop Howe refused to allow a resloution on the subject at the convention – I am going by memory so I could be wrong

  2. 2 robroy November 19, 2007 at 2:23 am

    The dennis canon states that property is held in trust for the national church AND the diocese. Thus, both parties hold claim to the property and possession being 9/10’s of the law. Ofcourse, the diocese of Ft Worth’s property is held by an incorporated body and no unilaterally amendment to the contract will change that.

    What the usurpers don’t understand if they win in court, they lose, and if they lose, they lose.

  3. 3 Marie at Rez November 19, 2007 at 3:31 pm

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Quincy pass the necessary resolutions, but then say something to the effect of “not at this time”?
    My thought when I read the posting on Quincy’s statement
    was that they would probably wait until a sufficient number of dioceses were ready to make a move, so they
    would not be singled out for PB’s special “reconciliation” tactics.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: